User talk:Cwagungood

Welcome
Hi, welcome to ! Thanks for your edit to the File:Victor 1.png page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Ralok (Talk) 21:37, March 21, 2013

okay then
I am definitly going to delete the page then, sorry, but we cant have pages with a bias here. And no I didnt watch the video, as I have seen a hundred million like it, all with glaring contradictions. . . every. . . single. . . one! If you actually believe this endless stream of garbage is real then I pity you, as it does nothing but discredit the field of xenobiology. ralok (talk) 18:20, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

actually
Actually. . . yes I do have the right to remove it if I find that the content is inappropriate, this wiki is not your private playground for spreading your (demonstratably false) beliefs. ralok (talk) 16:30, March 25, 2013 (UTC)

bias
Its the bias that makes it inappropriate. Articles need to maintain a neutral stance on their subject matter. You believe it is real, you wrote it as it was real, but other people may not feel so. That is the issue, now I have researched the character and the material it is from and have deemed it appropriate content for this wiki, but the page is going to need extensive work as well as research. I haven't done much work into real world ufology or alienology, so I or someone else is going to need to do some research before making a template for this type of page. But it will most certainly involve a list of contradictions with other similar claims towards roswell/area 51. . . I apologize for my attitude ralok (talk) 22:28, March 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh no harm, its just going to take a while and I tend to edit pages off-wiki on notepad before I put them up :I as well I am engulfed in other subjects right now that need a bigger portion of my intenion. So keep on adding stuff to your hearts content, just try to keep it a little more neutral okay dude? Everyone deserves to make up their own mind on stuff that could or could not be real. ralok (talk) 00:25, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

good work :)
Simple, small changes that helps keep the article from stepping on the toes of other Ufologiests, and ET enthusiasts and believers out there. Good work dude :) its important to keep these kind of articles open to interpretation for all people who read it, as to prevent controversy . . . lettign people make up their own minds about it, get what I am saying :) thank you for your cooperation, and edits :) ralok (talk) 22:05, March 28, 2013 (UTC)