Talk:Weeping Angel

Good heavens -- can anybody shrink those subsections for us? Those are obnoxiously gigantic. I am swamped with work; I'm only on to keep my badge progress. I won't be able to get to it until the weekend. -- Somarinoa 23:15, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

I created the page, so I'll decide when I get round to shrinking the subsections. I can't help if their obnoxious. Just leave it to me and everything will be fine. Thank you.Godtryan 19:08, October 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * Maybe it's because there's no information in those sections yet, but they definitely seem overly enlarged (not to mention the tremendous amount of code behind this which hints at the likelihood that it's not just my eyes playing tricks on me). Typically I just do the double equals with dual apostrophes on each end of a subsection (==' ', but without the space) followed by the text to get the large size and boldened look.  I find the new "1 equal = huge and uneditable, 2 equals = big and editable but not boldened, 3 equals = bold and editable but anything beyond this is ridiculously tiny" one of the more obnoxious changes that wikia has done over the...wow, apparently 5 years I've been editing articles.  Wow.  Anyway, I'd definitely say fill in the article info first, of course.  It's definitely more important than simple sizing of subsections, but eventually it should probably adhere to the stereotype.  It's such a minor detail I would have done it myself and all, but it's more important that I don't miss our unflexible deadline and get fired from my $12 cushy desk job, haha. -- Somarinoa 18:16, October 28, 2011 (UTC)